Legal Opinion
Corico v. Smith
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Demurrer by plaintiff to defendant’s answer.-
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries received while in defendant’s employ engaged in interstate commerce, occasioned by the defendant’s negligence under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Defendant’s answer alleges the affirmative defense that, the plaintiff, pursuant to the provisions *448of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, made application to the state workmen’s compensation commission for compensation for the same injuries set forth in' the complaint; that an award of $1,750.30 was duly and properly made by such commission tb the plaintiff, as provided in said act; that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reining v. . City of Buffalo, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Matter of Winfield v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Miller v. New York Railways Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Sharrow v. Inland Lines, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1913
- Lyons v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doney v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921