Sharrow v. Inland Lines, Ltd.
New York Supreme Court
Demubeeb to complaint in an action by an employee to recover for personal injuries.
1Opinion of the CourtWoodward, J.
The complaint in this action alleges that James Farrell, plaintiff’s intestate, was employed by the defendants as a stevedore in the city of Buffalo on the 10th day of May, 1911, and that while so employed he sustained injuries, due to the negligence of the defendants, which resulted in his death on the fourteenth day of May of the same year. It alleges the necessary proceedings for the appointment of an administrator, etc., and sets out the provisions of sections 1902 and 1903 of the Code of Civil Procedure, alleges compliance with the conditions precedent of *483the Employers’ Liability Act,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Whitford v. . the Panama Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Reining v. . City of Buffalo, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Hill v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Ackerman v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Corico v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1916
- Sharrow v. Inland Lines, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Sharrow v. Inland Lines, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914