Matter of Winfield v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The claimant was employed in connection with the general repair and maintenance of the tracks of the employer, the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company. While tamping ties he was struck in the right eye by a stone which came up from the ground. The workmen's compensation commission awarded him compensation at the rate of $6.54 weekly for two weeks. The claimant's employer at the time of the accident was engaged in interstate commerce. The appellant contends that because the claimant when injured was employed by a railroad company which was then engaged in interstate commerce,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Hennington v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Matter of Marhoffer v. . MarhofferNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Skelton Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Matter of Erickson v. . PreussNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.