Legal Opinion

President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Rom

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.

The procedure herein was proper. If it was intended that section 290 of the Civil Practice Act should apply only in the case of the taking of the deposition of adverse parties, specific provision to that effect would have been inserted therein. However, as the section now reads, particularly when considered with section 299 of the Civil Practice Act, its meaning is clear. In so far as the merits are concerned, the plaintiff is entitled to the examination herein sought. The witness will undoubtedly be hostile and hence special circumstances are present. (La Bonte v. Long Island, Railroad Co.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. La Bonte v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kagan v. GairNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. President of the Manhattan Co. v. RomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Happell v. GenoeseNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API