Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Druggists' Specialties Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 25, 1935No. 5609PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

Druggists Specialties Company, Inc., hereinafter called the complainant, held a permit “Issued under Title III of the National Prohibition Act” (section 1 et seq. [27 USCA §§ 63, 71 et seq.]), and extended from year to year, authorizing the monthly withdrawal — tax-free—of 4400 wine gallons of specially denatured alcohol, Formula No. 39-B, to be used in the manufacture of certain approved toilet preparations. On March 31, 1933, the Supervisor of Permits issued a citation under section 9 of title 2 of the act (27 USCA § 21), charging that the complainant had in bad faith…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Nicol v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Higgins v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  5. Selzman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. ZagerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
  2. United States v. BornnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. MinkerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1937
  4. Czarnecki v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  5. Morgenthau v. Mifflin Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API