Legal Opinion

United States v. Bornn

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 12, 1939No. 206PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Circuit Judge.

The United States, after trial on the merits with jury waived, recovered judgment for §100,000 and interest against both defendants on three bonds covering use of specially denatured alcohol by the defendant Bornn, and for the further sum of $303,858.22 against Bornn alone for taxes. The defendants’ appeal raises questions of law.

The bonds were given under the Denatured Alcohol Act of June 7, 1906, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 1320-1323, supplemented by title 3 of the National Prohibition Act, 27 U.S.C.A. §§ 71-89, and under Regulations 61 of the Treasury Department. By the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Various Items of Personal Property v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. United States v. MacKSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Glidden Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. United States v. J. R. Watkins Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. United States v. Van Schaack Bros. Chemical Works, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1940
  5. United States v. C. I. T. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API