Legal Opinion
Morgenthau v. Mifflin Chemical Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 29, 1937No. Nos. 6362, 6363PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
These two cases, since they are based upon substantially the same facts, will be considered in one opinion. The appellee, Mifflin Chemical Corporation, by bills of complaint filed in the court below, alleged that it was the holder of Federal Permit No. SDA — PA-—-70, which authorized the withdrawal of 9,150 wine gallons of various formulae of specially denatured alcohol per calendar month and its use in the manufacture of a large number of preparations and also the withdrawal of 24,000 wine gallons of specially denatured alcohol formula 23— G per calendar month and its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Yudelson v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
- United States Ex Rel. Smith v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- Helvering v. Druggists' Specialties Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Mifflin Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- United States v. J. R. Watkins Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
- In re Mifflin Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Sheridan v. RothensiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941