Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Breme

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 14, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

93 N.J. 569 (1983)

461 A.2d 1164

ALBERTA BOYLE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

CHARLES J. BREME, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 21, 1983.

Decided July 14, 1983.

Joseph Asbell argued the cause for appellant (Joseph Asbell, attorney; Yale I. Asbell, on the briefs).

John R. Gercke, Asst. County Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Steven D. Weinstein, Camden County Counsel, attorney).

2Per curiam

We affirm for the reasons stated by Judge Fritz in his opinion below. 187 N.J. Super. 129 (App.Div. 1982). We note that when the Legislature added a provision for co-employee immunity to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Newmark v. Gimbel's IncorporatedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  5. Lyon v. BarrettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API