Joaquin Encarnacion Hernandez v. Prudential Mortgage Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge.
Appellants are homeowners who have defaulted on their mortgage payments. Appellee Prudential is a mortgage holder seeking to foreclose, and appellee Padin is the president of Prudential. The case has a federal dimension because appellants acquired their homes through a federal subsidy program. Appellants argue that the program sets up procedures that must be followed before foreclosure is permissible. The court below rejected this claim. The program was established by section 235 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968. Codified at 12 U.S.C. § 1715z. The purpose…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. LynnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Brown v. LynnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eva Mae Roberts, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Cameron-Brown Company and Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Fleet Real Estate Funding Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Cross v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Heritage Bank, NA v. RuhNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Schultz v. Central Mortgage Co. (In Re Schultz)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.