Legal Opinion

Watson v. Pietranton

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1987No. 17193PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROTHERTON, Justice:

Dolores K. Pietranton, as executrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Frank A. Pietranton, an attorney, appeals a summary judgment in which the Circuit Court of Hancock County held that the deceased attorney’s fee agreement with another attorney was void as against public policy because the fee agreement violated DR2-107 of the West Virginia Code of Professional Responsibility.

Frank A. Pietranton practiced law for many years in the northern panhandle of West Virginia. In about 1978 Mr. Pietran-ton became ill and was unable to actively practice law. As a result of his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fleming v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. O'HARA v. Ahlgren, Blumenfeld & KempsterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Holstein v. GrossmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Tom E. MacUrdy v. Sikov & Love, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Shaffer v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API