Legal Opinion
Craig v. Driscoll
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 7, 2001No. AC 19299PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The plaintiffs, Valerie P. Craig and Samuel Craig,1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered subsequent to its granting of the motion to strike filed by the defendants David L. Davis and Hawk’s Nest, Inc.,2 pursuant to Practice Book § 10-44. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly granted the defendants’ motion to strike by concluding that the allegations of the plaintiffs’ amended complaint failed to state a cause of action for bystander emotional distress against the defendant purveyors of alcohol for (1) negligent infliction of emotional…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Advanced Financial Services, Inc. v. Associated Appraisal Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Franc v. Bethel Holding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Campbell v. Town of PlymouthConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Vona v. LernerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.