Legal Opinion

Blake v. Professional Coin Grading Service

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 16, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-11531-WGYPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

YOUNG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a case of an attorney who claims that he has discovered a method to grade the “eye appeal” of coins. Duane C. Blake (“Blake”) is a coin collector and inventor of this method, which he called the “axial ultimate refractory angle of the coin” (“AURA System” or “AURA”). Blake sought to promote the AURA System with Professional Coin Grading Service (“Professional Grading”), Collectors Universe, Inc. (“Universe”), and its competitor Numismatic Guaranty Corporation of America (“Numismatic”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). During initial talks…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. FougereCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  3. J & J Sports Productions Inc. v. CelaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  4. Brockton Power LLC v. City of BrocktonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  5. Photographic Illustrators Corp. v. Orgill, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API