Legal Opinion
United States v. Ringrose
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1986No. 85-5508PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
788 F.2d 638
UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. CHUNIE (Frances S.
Herrera), the Brotherhood of the Tomol, Inc., a
California corporation, and all Chumash
descendants similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs-
Appellants,
v.
Marie RINGROSE, Ilda McGuinness, Pier Gherini, Frances
Gherini, the Nature Conservancy, a District of Columbia
non-profit corporation, Santa Cruz Island Company, a
California corporation, Alexander Lennox Vail, James Vail
Wilkinson, Nathan Russell Vail, Margaret Vail Woolley, and
the Vickers Company, Ltd., a California Corporation; and
the State of California, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 85-5508.
United…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Western Mining Council v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States ex rel. Chunie v. RingroseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. McIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hamilton v. Bank of Blue ValleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- U.S. & State v. Somnia, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Chevron Environmental Management Co. v. BKK Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
- United States v. GardnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1995
- Villamizar v. Senior Care Pharmacy Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022