Legal Opinion
In Re Pipinos
California Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1982No. Crim. 22122PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
In In re Podesto (1976) 15 Cal.3d 921, 938 [127 Cal.Rptr. 97, 544 P.2d 1297], we held, pursuant to our supervisory authority over state criminal procedure, that trial courts should render a statement articulating their reasons for denying an application for release pending appeal.1 In this pro*193ceeding for writ of habeas corpus we are called upon to provide guidance as to what constitutes an adequate statement of reasons for denying release pending appeal. Particularly, we must determine whether the reasons stated by the trial court in denying petitioner’s request for bail on…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. MedinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- United States v. Benjamin J. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Honey Springs Homeowners Ass'n v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- In re Humphrey, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Browne v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
- C.S. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re ChristieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.