Legal Opinion
In re Christie
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 15, 2001No. B151539PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1107Opinion
PERREN, J.
The trial court set bail at 10 times the amount specified in the bail schedule but failed to state specific grounds for its decision. The role of this court in reviewing a bail setting is to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion. (Ex parte Duncan (1879) 53 Cal. 410, 411; Ex parte Hoge (1874) 48 Cal. 3, 5; People v. Norman (1967) 252 Cal.App.2d 381, 398 [60 Cal.Rptr. 609], overruled on other grounds by McDermott v. Superior Court (1972) 6 Cal.3d 693, 697 [100 Cal.Rptr. 297, 493 P.2d 1161]; 4 Witkin & Epstein, Cal. Criminal Law (3d ed. 2000) Pretrial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re PodestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cabell v. John H.California Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Ex parte HogeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Galen v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In re Humphrey, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Galen v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- In re White, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re Avignone, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.