Luoma v. City of Minneapolis

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Appellant James Luoma was convicted of D.W.I., Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(a) (1984), and claims the trial court did not allow defense counsel to impeach the Intox-ilyzer test results, the prosecutor committed misconduct in closing argument and that the trial court made prejudicial remarks and rulings during trial. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant was stopped for speeding in Minneapolis and was subsequently arrested for driving under the influence. Appellant consented to an Intoxilyzer test which resulted in a reading of .12 alcohol concentration. Appellant was charged with…