Callahan v. Class One, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
This court has consistently held that any sale of securities which have not been registered as required by R.C. Chapter 1707 — or which are not exempt from those requirements — will materially affect the protection afforded by the statute. Pencheff v. Adams (1983), 5 Ohio St. 3d 153, 5 OBR 318, 449 N.E. 2d 1277; Bronaugh v. R. & E. Dredging Co. (1968), 16 Ohio St. 2d 35, 45 O.O. 2d *77321, 242 N.E. 2d 572. The Montgomery County Court of Appeals has fashioned an exception to this rule where the buyer initiates the sale. That exception would upset a well-settled scheme of regulation designed to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bronaugh v. R. & E. Dredging Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
- Pencheff v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boland v. HammondOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Riedel v. Acutote of ColoradoDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Murphy v. Stargate Defense Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Bitounis v. Interactive Brokers, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2026
- Murphy v. Stargate Defense SysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.