Legal Opinion

State v. Blake

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 24, 2012No. 67247-9-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.

¶1 — As authorized by the Rules of Evidence, a lay witness may testify as to observations gleaned from his or her senses as well as to inferences arising from those perceptions. A witness need not have had actual visual perception of an event to testify that it occurred. Here, Jerome Blake contends that the jury heard impermissible opinion testimony from two witnesses — who testified that Blake shot Marquise Brown — because these two witnesses did not physically see the shot as it was being fired from the gun. Because this challenged testimony did not express impermissible opinions on guilt…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. MagersWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. DemeryWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. DemeryWashington Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Zachary Damien CravenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. State Of Washington v. Alexander John ZietzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. State Of Washington v. Earnest L. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. State Of Washington v. Larry DeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. State Of Washington v. Shaun C. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API