Legal Opinion

Globe-Wernicke Co. v. Safe-Cabinet Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1924No. 18171PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

In the consideration of this case we shall refer to the Safe-Cabinet Company as the plaintiff and to the Grlobe-Wernicke Company as the defendant, they having thus appeared in the trial court.

Some of the questions suggested in the briefs and urged upon the court in oral argument for further consideration were fully determined by this court in the former proceeding (92 Ohio St., 532, 112 N. E., 478), and must be regarded as adjudicated, and will be referred to only as it is necessary incidentally to do so in the discussion and the decision of the issues before us at this time.

The issue as to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. William Wrigley, Jr. Co. v. L. P. Larson, Jr. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API