Legal Opinion
Kum Chor Chee v. Katzenbach
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided June 8, 1966No. Civ. No. 2342PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL
TAVARES, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s Motion for a New Trial will also be considered as a motion for a rehearing; the facts of this case are set forth in the Decision of the Court, 252 F.Supp. 221, filed on April 11, 1966.
*302The only additional authority cited by plaintiff in connection with his motion is the case of Bertoldi v. McGrath (1949) 86 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 178 F.2d 977. The facts of that case, however, are totally different from the situation in the case at bar. In the Bertoldi case the petitioner was acquiring citizenship during the period that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bertoldi v. McGrath Atty. Gen.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Frausto v. BrownellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State v. Susanne RichterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Kum Chor Chee v. KatzenbachDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1966
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kum Chor Chee v. Ramsey Clark, Attorney General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967