Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Daily Record Co. v. Hartmann

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 2, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The relator has made a fair outline of this case, and we adopt it, as follows:

“This is an original proceeding in mandamus brought by the State at the relation of the Daily Record Company against Honorable Mose.s Plartmann et ah, Judges of the Eighth Judicial Circuit of the State of Missouri, comprising the city of St. Louis, sitting as a board under the provisions of Section 10405, Revised Statutes 1919, for the purpose of compelling respondents to award to relator a contract for printing all advertisements and judicial notices as therein provided.
“The petition for the writ was filed January…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lionberger v. TolleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Eberle v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. L'Hote v. Village of MilfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State ex rel. Waterworth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Springfield v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  2. Ex Parte LockhartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. State v. CushmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Ploch v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. Edmonds v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API