Legal Opinion

Behling v. Lohman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

Plaintiff first requests this court to change the answers of the jury with respect to the negligence issues so as to award judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of damages found by the jury. Because of the conflict of testimony with respect to how the accident occurred this court cannot find that Behling was free of all causal negligence. This would be necessary in order for this court to reverse the judgment and enter one in plaintiff’s favor awarding her the damages found by the jury.

The main thrust of plaintiff’s other contentions are that she should be awarded a new trial on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. BillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Strnad v. Co-Operative Insurance MutualWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Haggerty v. RainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Heibel v. VothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thoreson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. GresensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Nieman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Krauth v. QuinnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API