Legal Opinion
Whippany Associates & Marine Midland Realty Credit Corp. v. Township of Hanover
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided May 29, 1980PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVERS, J. T. C.
The subject of these complaints are contiguous industrial zoned properties situated at the intersection of Ridgedale Avenue and East Frederick Place and known as block 2104, lots 2, 8 and 9. The taxpayers appeal the 1974-1975 assessments on lot 2 and the 1975-1976 assessments on lots 8 and 9. All assessments were affirmed by the Morris County Tax Board. In addition to the question of valuation, to be resolved is whether there existed discrimination in assessments as alleged by the taxpayers. The assessment history follows.
Lot 2 Lot 8 Lot 9
Land $ 56,200 $ 78,000 $ 46,100
Improveme…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of New Brunswick v. State of New Jersey Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Rek Investment Co. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Tri-Terminal Corp. v. Borough of EdgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. Township of PiscatawaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lawrence Associates v. Lawrence TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
- Devonshire Development Associates v. City of HackensackNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
- 525 Realty Holding Co. v. Borough of Hasbrouck HeightsNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
- Hull Junction Holding Corp. v. Princeton BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1996
- 125 Monitor Street v. City of JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.