Legal Opinion

Packer v. Fifth Court of Appeals

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1989No. C-7821PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This mandamus action arises out of a misnumbered special commissioners’ report in a condemnation proceeding. Relator James A. Roddy was a party in two separate condemnation proceedings, numbered 86-727 and 86-728, brought by the City of Lancaster. At the hearing in 86-728, the subject of this mandamus action, the City’s attorney submitted several copies of a proposed award to be signed by the commissioners, and gave an unsigned copy to Rod-dy’s attorney. The document was misnum-bered, however, as 86-727 instead of 86-728. Relying on the erroneously numbered document, Roddy’s attorney…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. John v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gulf Energy Pipeline Co. v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  3. Terrell State Hospital of the Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Ashworth, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  4. Grocers Supply Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Copano NGL Services, LLC v. John Ashcraft, Individually and as Trustee for the John Ashcraft Family Trust 2012, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API