Legal Opinion

Rowan & Co. v. Hull

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1904PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Monroe County. Action by John L. Eowa-n & Co. -against J. W. Hull. From a judgment of the circuit court affirming a judgment for plaintiffs on,appeal from a justice, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

In the circuit court of Monroe county, in an appeal from a justice, John L. Rowan & Co. recovered against J. W. Hull, a verdict and judgment for $137.50, and from 'this judgment Hull has brought a writ of error. The claim of Rowan & Co. is, that Hull engaged them to sell for him a tract of land, and they *337undertook tbe service, and made effort to sell to 'several persons; that they interested John C. Ballard in the lands, and sent him to see it, but Hull informed Ballard that he had concluded not to sell, and had revoked the power of Rowan & Co. to sCl. Ballard then went to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Reynolds v. TompkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Sturm v. ParishWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Blumenthal v. BridgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Cloe v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Braniff v. BaierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Eichhorn v. LundinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API