Asklund v. Chicago Great Western Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiff, as special administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Carl Asklund, recovered a verdict on the ground that his death was caused by the wrongful act of defendants. Defendants appealed from an order denying their motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
The track of defendant railway company runs in a northerly direction from the village of Hampton in Dakota county. A winding country road running in an easterly and westerly direction crosses the track at a right angle about one and one-half miles north of the village.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Hinkle v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cayuna Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Hollister v. HinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Lando v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Johnson v. TruesdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roth v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Schroht v. VollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Forde v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Hoyum v. Duluth, Winnipeg Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.