Forde v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Appeal from an order granting defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
This personal injury action, brought by a front-seat automobile passenger, arises out of a collision between an automobile and a passenger train which was backing up over a railway crossing in the city of Bemidji where Midway Drive, a four-lane concrete highway of a width of 40 feet, intercepts a main-line railway track and a switch track. Although the directions are not exact according to the points of the compass, it may be assumed for the purposes of this decision that the four-lane…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Evison v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Engberg v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Schroht v. VollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Tiedeman v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul And Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Anderson v. HEDGES MOTOR COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Purdes v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.