Faraj v. Chulisie
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Appelwick, J.
— Following a personal injury arbitration, the arbitrator awarded Faraj damages. Chulisie filed a motion for a trial de novo. Faraj filed a motion to strike Chulisie’s request, arguing that he had failed to fulfill the requirements of Mandatory Arbitration Rule (MAR) 7.1(a). Chulisie appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a trial de novo. Faraj cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of his request for a multiplier in its attorney fees award. We affirm the trial court on other grounds and deny Faraj’s appeal on attorney fees.
FACTS
¶2 This appeal arises out of a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chuong Van Pham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Chuong Van Pham v. Seattle City LightWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Russell v. MaasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- MKB Constructors v. American Zurich InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.