Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Steak N Shake, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 15, 2024No. 1:21-cv-01212Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION EMILY HARDING, on behalf of herself ) CASE NO. 1:21-cv-1212 and all others similarly situated, ) ) JUDGE BRIDGET MEEHAN BRENNAN Plaintiff, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION v. ) AND ORDER ) STEAK N SHAKE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) Before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for partial summary judgment. (Doc. No. 83.) Defendant Steak N Shake, Inc. (“Steak N Shake”) opposed the motion (Doc. No. 86), and Plaintiffs replied in support (Doc. No. 90.) For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND A.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API