Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Coleman v. Rose

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1906No. 14,646PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Original proceeding for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

■ The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This is a proceeding to punish W. W. Rose for contempt of the supreme court in violating its judgment recently rendered against him. It appears that at the general city election in April, 1905, Rose was elected mayor of Kansas City, Kan., for the term of two years ending April 12, 1907. On September 26, 1906, the attorney-general brought an action of quo warranto in the name of the state to remove Rose from office, alleging that since his incumbency of the office he had purposely violated the law by licensing and protecting those who…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Thurston v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. WelshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Hunter v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  5. In Re Proving the Alleged Last Will & Testament of HathawayNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. People v. . AhearnNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Recall Bennett Committee v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State ex rel. Wilson v. BushTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Gelch v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API