State v. . Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNHill, J.
Does chapter 228 of the Public Laws of 1933 create a continuing offense? This is the one question involved on this appeal. If the act does not create a continuing offense, the defendant’s plea of former jeopardy must be sustained. If it does create a continuing offense, his conviction upon a charge of willfully failing and neglecting to support his illegitimate child prior to 2 April, 1937, is a bar only to any further proceedings on account of his conduct prior to the date of his conviction. The defendant, through his counsel, consented that the second issue submitted to the jury should be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- United States v. SwiftDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1911
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Commonwealth v. PeretzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- City of Baton Rouge v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Savage v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Burgos FuentesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- State v. LicariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.