Martin v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, Judge.
James W. Martin, Jr., appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his truck. For the following reasons, we reverse.
The proper standard of review was recently reiterated by the Supreme Court:
[W]hen a motion to suppress is heard by the trial judge, that judge sits as the trier of facts____[T]he trial court’s decision with regard to questions of fact and credibility must be accepted unless clearly erroneous____[T]he reviewing court must construe the evidence most favorably to the upholding of the trial court’s findings and judgment. [Cit.]…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Clay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Caffo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. AbleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Nash v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- State v. GauthierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- The State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- The State v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.