Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Corleto

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1984No. 48PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

The Philadelphia Police Department obtained a search warrant for appellee’s apartment. The warrant was executed and various controlled substances were discovered and seized. Appellee was arrested and charged with the manufacture, delivery and possession, with intent to deliver, of a controlled substance. Appellee filed a pre-trial motion to suppress the proceeds of the search. After a hearing, *524the court suppressed the challenged physical evidence. The Commonwealth here appeals such ruling.1

The issue before us on this appeal is whether the application for the search…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LemanskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. BagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. CampersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API