Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Hooper

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 15, 1960No. 11,113Published

1DissentFerguson, Judge

(dissenting);

I dissent.

As I believe my brothers do no more than affirm this case on an ad hoc basis, I am unable to join in their conclusion, unsupported by the record of trial and our previous opinion in United States v Hooper, 9 USCMA 637, 26 CMR 417.

The accused, a retired naval officer, was tried by general court-martial and convicted of sodomy, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 125, 10 USC § 925; public association with known sexual deviates, in violation of Code, supra, Article 133, 10 USC § 933; and the commission of an indecent, lewd, and lascivious act, in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. FieldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. GriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. HooperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. PhillipsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API