Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Scott

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1945PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The single question here involved is whether the amount of the federal estate tax on this estate should be deducted from the residuum of the estate before computing the additional collateral inheritance tax payable to the state of Oregon, under the second paragraph of § 20-105, O. C. L. A., on the distributive share of James B. O’Shea, Jr., nephew of the decedent. The circuit court ruled that the federal estate tax should not be deducted. From this order John F. O’Donnell, executor, and James B. O’Shea, Jr., administrator with the will annexed of the estate of John F. O’Shea, deceased, have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Frick Et Al. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Poulsen v. HoffOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Stowe v. RyanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Cabell v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Executive Management Corporation v. JuckettOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. PopielOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re the Estate of RettenmeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Beatty v. CakeOregon Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API