Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1963No. 530PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff states in his brief that “this is not an action to secure contribution of a joint tort-feasor’s proportionate part of a payment on a Judgment . . .; it is an action to secure the entire proceeds available under defendant’s insurance policy to be applied on said Judgment as complete reimbursement of the . . . $10,000.00 . . . payment made by William Curtis Garner, who was responsible on this judgment only through Henry Fletcher Garner. . . .” In other words, plaintiff maintains that the 'Complaint states a cause of action to require Nationwide, under the terms of the automobile…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Gregg v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Hendricks v. Leslie Fay, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Bowen v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Steele v. Moore-Flesher Hauling CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API