Legal Opinion
People v. Horling
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1904No. Docket No. 190PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Exceptions before judgment from Ottawa; Padgham, J. John W. Horling, Bert Horling, and John Horling were convicted of illegal fishing.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
The respondents were convicted of violating the provisions of section 5849, % Comp. Laws, which reads':
“That it shall not be lawful for any person to take, catch, or bill, or attempt to take, catch, or kill, any fish in any of the inland lakes in this State with any kind of spear, or grap hook or by the use of jacks or artificial light of any kind, or by the use of set lines or night lines, or any kind of net, or any kind of fire-arms or explosive or other device, except the hook and line.”
The accompanying plat will help to understand the situation (p. 408).
The testimony on the part of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. SanborneMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- Lincoln v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Thunder Bay River Booming Co. v. SpeechlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- People v. CollisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. BridgesIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Game Commission v. Red River Valley Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- Giddings v. RogalewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Territory v. Hoy ChongHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
- Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation v. Nestlé Waters North America IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Putnam v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.