Territory v. Hoy Chong
Hawaii Supreme Court
Error to District Magistrate oe Honolulu.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
ROBERTSON, C.J.
Tbe charge upon which the plaintiff-in-error was tried and convicted in the court below was that he “did at Honolulu, city and county of Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii, during one week last past prior to and including the 29th day of December, A. D. 1911, unlawfully and wilfully expose and offer for sale certain fish known as amaama, contrary to Act 110, Laws of the Territory of Hawaii, ¡Session of 1911.”
The first section of the act in question provides, “That it shall be unlawful for any person to fish for or take, or to be engaged in the fishing for or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Huntington v. WorthenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Scott v. FlowersNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. BridgesIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. GrahovacHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. TaylorHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. BlossHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Damon v. Shinjiro TsutsuiHawaii Supreme Court · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.