Legal Opinion

American Exchange Bank v. Bornstein

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoseNBerry, J.

A considerable part of the argument both in the briefs and upon the hearing here related to the extent and nature of the fraud claimed by the plaintiff to have been practiced upon it by the defendants. In view of the fact that the plaintiff had not yet finished its proof upon that point and that the court took from the jury further consideration of the case on the ground that there was an accord and satisfaction, it must be assumed here that there was at least sufficient evidence to go to the jury on the question of defendants’ fraud and that the jury would have found thereon favorably to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strang v. BradnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Continental National Bank of Chicago v. McGeochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Loney v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  4. In re WaiteDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1915
  5. Mellen v. GoldsmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shekell v. Ypsilanti Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Mayfield Woolen Mills v. Goodrich & Martineau Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API