Legal Opinion

Mayfield Woolen Mills v. Goodrich & Martineau Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfleR, J.

From the stipulation it appears that the defendant, Goodrich ó- Martineau Company, a Wisconsin corporation, being unable to meet the financial demands against it, although claiming to be solvent, on September 3, 1924, made, executed, and delivered to three trustees an assignment of all of its property, real and personal, for the benefit of its creditors. The instrument did not comply with the statutes on voluntary assignments and was more in the nature of a common-law assignment. It was not, in some minor respects, non-preferential, because it authorized the trustees to liquidate and settle…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Winner v. HoytWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Parsons v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Gilbert Paper Co. v. Whiting Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Detroit Stove Works v. OsmunMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Duryea v. MuseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Edl v. Kinast (In Re Edl)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1997
  3. John v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Herman Weiss Co. v. Goodrich & Martineau Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. I. Fleischer & Sons v. Goodrich & Martineau Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API