In re Waite
District Court, D. Maryland
In the matter of J. Herbert Waite and another, individually and as copartners trading as John Turnbull, Jr., & Co., bankrupts. On objections to the bankrupts’ discharge.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, District Judge.
[1] J. Herbert Waite and Daniel H. Doyle, individually and as copartners, trading as John Turnbull, Jr., & Co., are in bankruptcy. They will be referred to as the bankrupts. The First National Bank of this city, hereafter called the Bank, is one of their creditors. It has objected to their discharge on the. ground that they obtained money from it on credit upon a knowingly false statement furnished by them to it. Prior to September 19, 1910, the firm of. John Turnbull, Jr., & Co. consisted, in addition to the present bankrupts, of John Turnbull, Jr., and Samuel R. Waite.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frank v. Michigan Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910
- In re SavareseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Josephs v. Powell & CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- In re MillerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1912
- In re WyllyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- CHF Finance Company v. JochumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- Samet v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
- In re WeitzmanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1923
- Morton v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- In Re SlohmDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.