Legal Opinion

Malkiewicz v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided January 5, 1989No. 3-87-0147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WISEMAN, Chief Judge.

An “employer” under Tennessee’s Workers’ Compensation Law is liable for work ers’ compensation benefits only. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-108 (1983). Tennessee law extends this immunity to the employer’s insurer. See Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-102(a)(3) (1983) (including an employer’s insurer within the definition of “employer”); Spears v. Morris & Wallace Elevator Co., 684 S.W.2d 620, 622 (Tenn.Ct.App.1984). Tennessee also allows employers satisfying certain requirements to become self-insured for workers’ compensation purposes. See Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-405 (1983).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kifer v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Pedro Cardona Muniz v. National Can CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. Ray v. Transamerica InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Kotarski v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965
  5. Bernard Kotarski, Special Administrator of the Estate of Frederick E. Gutowski, Deceased v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deines v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  2. Malkiewicz v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API