Legal Opinion
Pedro Cardona Muniz v. National Can Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 26, 1984No. 83-1640PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Senior Circuit Judge.
The main question this consolidated appeal raises is whether a parent corporation assumed primary responsibility for industrial safety at a subsidiary corporation’s plant. A second question is whether newly discovered evidence, consisting of interoffice correspondence between the two companies, proved that the parent corporation assumed responsibility for safety at the subsidiary’s plant. The district court answered both questions in the negative. Muniz v. National Can Corp., No. 81-0435 (TR), slip op. at 4 (D.P.R. July 14, 1983) and Muniz v. National Can Corp.,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Keebler Company v. Rovira Biscuit Corporation, Keebler Company v. Rovira Biscuit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Boggs v. Blue Diamond Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Constructora Maza, Inc. v. Banco De PonceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Rci Northeast Services Division v. Boston Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Abraham Alvarado-Morales v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Martinez v. E.i. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- De-Jesus-Adorno v. Browning Ferris Industries of Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.