Hilderman v. Enea TekSci, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ENEA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART COUN-TERDEFENDANTS’ FIRST MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (3) DENYING COUNTERDEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (4) GRANTING ENEA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE SECOND AND THIRD CLAIMS OF BAGHAFS COUNTERCLAIM
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
Defendant Enea TekSci, Inc. (“Enea”) has filed a motion for summary judgment on the Complaint filed by Vance Hilder-man (“Hilderman”) and Highrely, Inc. (“Highrely”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”).…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Fannie Garcia v. City of Laredo, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Steinhausen v. HomeServices of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Lazette v. KulmatyckiDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
- Solid Host, NL v. Namecheap, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.