Legal Opinion
Otay Land Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 2008No. D052057PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
This appeal from a judgment of dismissal in favor of defendant and respondent Royal Indemnity Company (Royal), following an order sustaining its demurrer without leave to amend, was brought by plaintiffs and appellants Flat Rock Land Company and its predecessor, Otay Land Company (collectively Flat Rock or plaintiff). The complaint filed by Flat Rock sought declaratory relief regarding Royal’s anticipated insurance coverage of one of Royal’s former insureds, nonparty United Enterprises et al. (United), with respect to contamination problems at the property now owned by Flat…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Haynes v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Centex Homes v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- D. Cummins Corp. v. U.S. Fid. & Guaranty Co., California Court of Appeal, 1st District2016
- Airborne America, Inc. v. Kenway CompositesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- D. Cummins Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Fox Paine & Co, LLC v. Twin City Fire Ins CoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.