Legal Opinion

Rundquist v. State of Kansas

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 6, 2025No. 5:25-cv-03104Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SCOTT RUNDQUIST, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 25-3104-JWL STATE OF KANSAS, et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner proceeds pro se. The Court has screened the Petition (Doc. 4) under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases, foll. 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and finds that this matter is subject to dismissal. Petitioner states that he seeks “emergency relief from an unlawful restraint and sacred family rights.” (Doc. 1, at 1.) He alleges that he has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Montez v. McKinnaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API