Worker's Compensation Claim of Rice v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[¶1] Appellant David Rice was denied worker's compensation benefits for a claim of injury resulting from chemical exposure, and he appeals. Following a hearing, the hearing examiner found that Rice neither timely filed an injury report nor proved by a preponderance of the evidence all elements of his claim. We hold that the finding that his injury . report was not timely filed is clearly contrary to the weight of the evidence, but uphold the conclusion that Rice did not prove his injury by a preponderance of the evidence and affirm the order denying benefits.
*510ISSUES
[¶ 2] Rice…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Baldwin v. ScullionWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Martinez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Robbins v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Kuntz-Dexter v. STATE EX REL. WYOMING WORKERS'SAFETY AND COMPENSATION DIVISIONWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.