Legal Opinion

Salm v. Broncato

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided June 15, 2001No. 99-3039PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.

The argument seemed sound enough, but when a theory collides with a fact, the result is a tragedy.

Louis Nizer

“My Life in Court”

Doubleday, 1961

Plaintiffs theories regarding the deprivation of her civil rights may seem sound, but her theories have collided with the fact that (1) she has not established a nexus between her speech and the non-renewal of her employment contract and the fact that (2) she has not established that she was an employee of the State of Illinois.

Summary judgment granted for Defendants.

I. BACKGROUND

On August 27, 1996, Fayrene…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Myers v. BrunsvoldDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API