Legal Opinion

Myers v. Brunsvold

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided May 22, 2009No. 06-3276Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

Were the Plaintiffs laid off for political reasons?

The Court concludes that they have not met their burden.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is allowed.

All of the Plaintiffs are former Site Superintendents with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (“IDNR”), who before being laid off worked at various natural resource sites around the State of Illinois. The Defendants contend that the Plaintiffs’ positions were abolished for budgetary reasons.

The Plaintiffs filed a two-count complaint, alleging in Count I that they were laid off from their…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Rutan v. Republican Party of IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Zerante v. DeLucaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API