Legal Opinion

Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Southern California Edison Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 2012No. B230470PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANEY, J.

Defendant Southern California Edison Company (Edison) appeals from the judgment entered against it following a bench trial in which the court ruled that Edison was liable to Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Pacific Bell) for just compensation in Pacific Bell’s cause of action for inverse condemnation. We affirm.

*1403FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

The relevant facts of this appeal are not disputed. Edison has installed bird guards to prevent animal contact with energized components of its electrical facilities. Unfortunately, on January 11, 2006, near the intersection of Valley…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foley Investments v. Alisal Water Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. PG&E CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. Siskiyou County v. PacifiCorpDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API